ExamShortcut

Sentence Improvement

🔒 Log in to track
high importance~2 Q in Tier 1⚡ 18 shortcuts6 subtopics
All subtopics·Subtopic 1 of 6

The elimination ladder: how to choose in 20 seconds

🔒 Log in to track
⏱ 4 min read🧩 5 question types🎯 12 practice Q
The idea in one minute

In a sentence improvement question, one part of the sentence is in bold. Four options offer a replacement, and one of them is usually No substitution required. You are not looking for the best-sounding English. You are looking for the one option that passes every grammar test the bold part failed.

01

What the question asks

One part of the sentence is bold. Decide if that part has a fault. If it does, pick the option that repairs it.

Only the bold part may change. The rest of the sentence stays as it is.

Rule: Read the full sentence first. The word before the bold part often decides the answer (yesterday, did, each, no sooner).

02

The elimination ladder

Go down these five steps. Cross out options as you go.

StepQuestion to askWhat it removes
1. Verb form and tenseDoes the verb suit its time word and helper?Tense clashes, wrong form after did or have
2. AgreementDoes the verb match the real subject?Plural verbs after each, one of, the list of
3. StructureIs the order and pairing standard?Broken inversion, mixed pairs
4. Word choiceIs this the fixed partner word?insisted for, angry on, return back
5. EconomyDoes an option say the same in fewer words?Extra words (but do not over-cut)

In most questions, two options die at step 1 or 2. Steps 3 and 4 then split the last two.

03

Two kinds of wrong option

Wrong options come in two types.

  • Repeat-fault options keep the same fault in new clothes: more better becomes more good. Cross them out at once.
  • New-fault options fix one fault but add another. Hardly ... than replaces a wrong word with a wrong partner.

A good option must be cleaner than the original. It must not be wrong in a different way.

04

When one fix adds a second fault

Take this sentence: My friend has gone to Delhi yesterday. The fault is has gone with yesterday. The fix is went.

Had gone looks like a fix. It removes the present perfect, but it needs an earlier past event. The sentence has none. So it is wrong.

Watch: After you pick an option, read the whole sentence again. A fix that clashes with another word is not a fix.

05

Families of decoys

Options often come from one word's relatives.

  • Look-alikes: effect / affect, loose / lose, advice / advise.
  • Form changes: brave / bravely / braveness.
  • Double markers: more better, most shortest.
  • Helper swaps: has, had, was, did in every mix.

Name the family, then pick the member that fits the job of the slot.

06

No substitution required

This option is correct in about one question out of four. It is a real answer, not a decoy.

Before you choose it, run steps 1 to 3 once. Never choose it just because the sentence "sounds fine".

Tip: Two options both fix the fault? Choose the one that changes less and keeps the meaning. The exam improves grammar, not ideas.

07

Question types you will see

Each type: how to recognise it, the method step by step, and one question to try.

Type 1very common3 practice Q

Single fault with repeat-fault decoys

How to spot it:

The bold part has one clear fault. Two or three options repeat the same fault (more good for more better, have been for was).

Method
  1. Name the fault and its rule.

  2. Cross out every option that still breaks the rule.

  3. Compare the survivors and pick the smallest clean repair.

Why it works:

Repeat-fault options trap students who fix the fault in their head and stop reading.

Try this

The quality of the mangoes were not satisfactory this season. (was / have been / No substitution required / are being)

Show solution
  1. The real subject is 'quality', which is singular.

  2. So the helper must be singular: 'was'.

  3. 'Have been' and 'are being' repeat the plural fault.

Answer

was

Type 2very common3 practice Q

No substitution required

How to spot it:

The bold part is already standard English. The other options are 'repairs' that break it.

Method
  1. Run the tense, agreement and structure checks on the bold part.

  2. If it passes every check, do not invent a fault.

  3. Choose No substitution required.

Why it works:

Every paper has a few correct originals. Changing a correct sentence is a common self-made error.

Try this

She has been teaching in this school since 2015. (teaches / is teaching / No substitution required / has taught)

Show solution
  1. 'Since 2015' points to an action that started then and continues.

  2. That needs the present perfect continuous: 'has been teaching'.

  3. Each other option breaks that meaning.

Answer

No substitution required

Type 3common3 practice Q

Decoy families around the bold word

How to spot it:

The options are relatives of the bold word: adjective and adverb forms, noun forms, effect / affect type twins.

Method
  1. Decide the job of the slot: does it describe a noun or an action?

  2. Cross out family members that do the wrong job.

  3. Keep the one whose meaning fits the sentence.

Why it works:

Sorting the family by job, not by sound, clears the set.

Try this

The soldier was praised for his brave act during the rescue. (bravely / No substitution required / braveness / bravest)

Show solution
  1. The slot describes the noun 'act'.

  2. A word that describes a noun is an adjective: 'brave'.

  3. Bravely is an adverb and braveness is a noun. So the original is right.

Answer

No substitution required

Type 4common3 practice Q

Two-fault trap options

How to spot it:

One tempting option fixes the visible fault but adds a second one: a wrong sequence, a broken pair or a wrong word type.

Method
  1. Fix the visible fault in your head first.

  2. Test each tempting option against the other words in the sentence.

  3. Reject any option that needs a second repair.

Why it works:

'Had gone yesterday' feels fixed. Only a second look shows the new fault.

Try this

My friend has gone to Delhi yesterday to attend an interview. (went / had gone / No substitution required / has went)

Show solution
  1. 'Yesterday' needs the simple past: 'went'.

  2. 'Had gone' needs an earlier past event, and the sentence has none.

  3. 'Has went' keeps the fault and adds another.

Answer

went

Type 5occasional

Meaning guard between clean options

How to spot it:

Every option is grammatical. One of them changes who does the action (active to passive) or adds a new doer.

Method
  1. Say who does the action in the original.

  2. Cross out options that change the doer or the meaning.

  3. If the original is correct, pick No substitution required.

Why it works:

The exam corrects grammar. It does not ask you to rewrite the idea.

Try this

The police caught the thief after a long chase. (The thief was caught by the police / No substitution required / The thief caught the police / Caught the thief the police)

Show solution
  1. The original is a correct active sentence.

  2. The passive option is also correct English, but nothing asks for it.

  3. The other two options change the meaning or break the order.

Answer

No substitution required

08

Shortcuts that save time

⚡ Find the anchor before you read the options

Look for the time word or helper verb near the bold part. Decide what the verb must look like. Then pick the option that matches your form.

Example

She has met him yesterday evening. (met / has meet / was met / No substitution required)

Show solution
  1. The anchor is 'yesterday', a finished past time.

  2. A finished past time needs the simple past.

  3. Simple past of meet is 'met'. The other two fail at step 1.

Answer

met

⚡ Tag every option with its flaw

In your head, label each option: 'plural verb', 'wrong partner', 'breaks inversion'. If no option has a flaw, the answer is No substitution required.

⚡ Meaning guard

Two options are both grammatical? Choose the one that keeps the original meaning word for word. An option that changes who did what is wrong.

09

Mistakes to avoid

Where most students lose marks on this subtopic.

Mistake 01

Choosing a correct option that changes the meaning (active to passive, an added doer).

Keep the meaning. Change only what the fault needs.

Mistake 02

Choosing 'No substitution required' because the sentence sounds natural.

Run the tense, agreement and structure checks first.

Mistake 03

Repairing a part that is not in bold.

Only the bold part may change.

Mistake 04

Missing the anchor word outside the bold part.

Read the whole sentence before you look at the options.

Mistake 05

Picking an option that fixes one fault and adds another.

Read the finished sentence again once.

10

Quick revision

Read this the night before the exam.

  • Read the whole sentence. The anchor is often outside the bold part.

  • Ladder: tense, agreement, structure, word choice, economy.

  • Cross out options that repeat the fault. Cross out options that add a new fault.

  • No substitution required is a real answer. Check steps 1 to 3 before you pick it.

  • Two options fix the fault? The smaller change that keeps the meaning wins.

  • Watch the decoy families: effect / affect, brave / bravely, more better, helper swaps.

11

Practice: 12 questions

Sets of 10, mixed across the question types above. Every answer has a step-by-step explanation.

Topic test · 12 questions

Suggested time 8 min · wrong answers go to your mistake notebook automatically.